Naga Females Do Have Breasts!

So, I am glad you put this here, because I was questioning this myself.
I was RPing as Sanamia, my female Naga character. People kept calling her sir. Someone made a comment like this "if its a girl, put some tits on it!!!" My response was- "It is not reptilian, and therefore would not have mammalian glands." I was not sure if this was true, however. Since it is a Naga...
Thanks for clearing this up!!!
 
Really? Come on guys, this is the Internet. Just respect the fact that he likes things, and this thread is due to all the pricks who were hella militant that Nagan Woman had flat chests. I can completely understand where he is coming from, and why.

If ya'll really want to continue to berate him for this, maybe you should look in the mirror for a moment. Are ya'll really so perfect that you can mock others? Cause so long as you have one flaw, judging anyone over their preferences just makes you a hypocritical sack of gosa, something that no one wants to be.

So to make the point clearer for those who's can't already tell, calm the frak down and back off.
 
Ya, this naga lore obsession is a little to big considering that you made this thread.
Really? Come on guys, this is the Internet. Just respect the fact that he likes things, and this thread is due to all the pricks who were hella militant that Nagan Woman had flat chests. I can completely understand where he is coming from, and why.

If ya'll really want to continue to berate him for this, maybe you should look in the mirror for a moment. Are ya'll really so perfect that you can mock others? Cause so long as you have one flaw, judging anyone over their preferences just makes you a hypocritical sack of gosa, something that no one wants to be.

So to make the point clearer for those who's can't already tell, calm the frak down and back off.
 
For once could we have a race where the females don't have breasts? Visible breasts on females are a trait unique to single species, ours. Do Naga have mammary glands? Do they reproduce internally? Why do secondary sexual characteristics need to be the same for every sapient species? This sort of thing is explainable with other mammals, even with the Mekett who were once fairly humanoid. But with fish and reptiles? Things just get silly.

Do female Maiar have breasts? They reproduce externally and raise their young communally. What use would breasts have in a species where the females might not even be the ones doing the child rearing?


Long story short, lizards with breasts has always been my one big caveat with fantasy, and I'm disappointed with Massive for being, in my opinion, uncreative in this regard.
 
People, who else is going to focus on the Naga? Not one staff member even has a Naga character and the race as a whole are currently one of the more unexplored races when it comes to anatomy limits, culture, entertainment and living style. I merely created this thread to prove I was right when I said to some people that Naga females have breasts. Also, I do not quite see why everyone is saying I'm obsessed with them, do I post multiple threads about Naga? No, I don't. This in fact has been the first thread in several months I have posted specifically about the Naga people.
So, I thus find it a tad bit rude that people are saying I'm "obsessed" with the Naga.

Thank you and let's all get back to doing...whatever this thread has become.
 
@The Shadow King

The breasts for a Naga woman could even be something totally different! I hear that you love Naga's, understood, but maybe a tincy tone down for the facts?

Perhaps this thread could be cleared and turned into ideas of anatomy of lore animals such as the traits of the genders other than women having breasts as their defining feature and men having a flat chest etc..? The Maiar, Naga and so on could be totally different on how they define the sex of each person/thing.

I'd like to apologise if I was rude earlier on.
 
Anatomy yah say?
Internal_Naga_Anatomy_by_sugarpeep.jpg

Derp
 
When people say this is a useless fact it's actually a bit important.
If you thought about it before, some might have thought that they didn't have the breasts in the first place, having a distortion on how the characters looked (At least the female ones), or their anatomy and how they lived. If some character wrote about the Naga before, they might need to correct themself or a few pages in their research of the races. (Granted if the breasts are "functional")

Before people go on more rants about this being perverted, he's proving a point he has been trying to make for a while to several people. He's even a race next to no one will be besides the good few. C'mon, cut some slack for the guy, especially if people begin grouping against him like this.
 
When people say this is a useless fact it's actually a bit important.
If you thought about it before, some might have thought that they didn't have the breasts in the first place, having a distortion on how the characters looked (At least the female ones), or their anatomy and how they lived. If some character wrote about the Naga before, they might need to correct themself or a few pages in their research of the races. (Granted if the breasts are "functional")

Before people go on more rants about this being perverted, he's proving a point he has been trying to make for a while to several people. He's even a race next to no one will be besides the good few. C'mon, cut some slack for the guy, especially if people begin grouping against him like this.
AGREED
 
This helps me, considering how I was thinking about creating a female Naga character...Hmm..
 
When people say this is a useless fact it's actually a bit important.
If you thought about it before, some might have thought that they didn't have the breasts in the first place, having a distortion on how the characters looked (At least the female ones), or their anatomy and how they lived. If some character wrote about the Naga before, they might need to correct themself or a few pages in their research of the races. (Granted if the breasts are "functional")
In terms of a character application, it really wouldn't come up except -maybe- in the body description. It's really an insignificant thing
 
When people say this is a useless fact it's actually a bit important.
If you thought about it before, some might have thought that they didn't have the breasts in the first place, having a distortion on how the characters looked (At least the female ones), or their anatomy and how they lived. If some character wrote about the Naga before, they might need to correct themself or a few pages in their research of the races. (Granted if the breasts are "functional")

Before people go on more rants about this being perverted, he's proving a point he has been trying to make for a while to several people. He's even a race next to no one will be besides the good few. C'mon, cut some slack for the guy, especially if people begin grouping against him like this.


Most of the time when people are researching lore on the race they are or plan to be, they aren't trying to figure out whether or not the race has tits. :^)

Not really an important fact. Although I can see it being helpful with More Player Models.
 
Most of the time when people are researching lore on the race they are or plan to be, they aren't trying to figure out whether or not the race has tits. :^)

Not really an important fact. Although I can see it being helpful with More Player Models.
It's not fully upon creating the character is what I mean, but IC "scientists" because even the smallest details are even important.

Oh, and more player models.
In terms of a character application, it really wouldn't come up except -maybe- in the body description. It's really an insignificant thing
If some character wrote about the Naga before, they might need to correct themself or a few pages in their research of the races. (Granted if the breasts are "functional")
I had actually placed in my initial post saying "if Some character wrote", and not like a character application of "Someone wrote", and in a character introduction it really is insignificant, there isn't importance of that in an introduction.
Sorry if I worded it wrong, I thought that it was more clear it was to the scientific characters in my post, and not actual people, because to US, most couldn't care less.
 
Last edited: