Please elaborate how we force you to be characters you do not wish to be?
Forcing all vampires to be under control of Mrs. Baver. What about those who wish to be good people trapped as a vampire not under her control?
Look, mate. Each little characteristic outlined by the lore is the burden you take when taking the cloak of a vampire. You act in the present to change the future. You can't go changing the past because it was out into stone by the people who've worked to create the world you live in today (not the admins, but all the people who have ever role played). Is it fair if you get to screw up a history that people have worked to make? You got to live with it. And on a slightly personal note I am very disappointed by you and your outbursts here.
I said trapped. I did that to my character.
and you fail to notice, as Mrs. Baver, that my character's hood fell off. Then you switch to Wolffram and don't execute me. And I am positive you paid Jett to kill me.[DOUBLEPOST=1362178039][/DOUBLEPOST]
I was trying to get Wolffram to try his specialty to cure Golivan.
erm, all vampires can be cured if they want to be good. those that wish to be good vampires make absolutely no sense in a roleplay perspective.
Those 3: Boom77777 (Ash), me (unless I quit), I'm nit sure but Watchdog might be a nice vampire (it might be that I'm a vampire).
Well... The problem is that 99% of all the vampires in the server are good, and it should be the other way around. And 3 was just a rough number, it could be more or less. All I was trying to convey was that the amount of "good vampires" should be so tiny, that it is literally only 1 or 2 people. If any. It would be more realistic if there were NO good vampires, but apparently people don't want to be limited to only being able to play evil bad guys, they want to be able to play good bad guys. -.-
I love you. AND YOU TOO TOM!
You were my next guess :|
Like you should.
But they are controlled by Baver in one way or another. Their disease makes them susceptible to Bavers control, and otherwise the general publics hating of Wolfrram and Vampires helped break the protective spells on Regalia, and through this, as said above, Vampires are directly (through following Baver) and indirectly responsible for this attack. It is the fault of the vampires for trying to plauge the streets of Regalia. And, you know what? If vampires were SMART they COULD have rights. How? BY PRETENDING TO BE HUMAN. its not that hard.. hide your disease and you wont be hunted. thats common sense.. throughout all vampiric lore, even Massives lore. (i'm looking at you, eyebrows, mr. "We write our own lore") If you really want to walk the streets of Regalia safely, than pass yourself as a human. If not, dont complain that the people of Regalia want to keep their city and families safe! The curse of the walking dead, vampirism, is not one the people of Regalia want plauging their streets, their homes, their church-- their life![DOUBLEPOST=1362241096][/DOUBLEPOST]
You are wrong in doing so, especially since I think a member of the Team knows a lot more about the lore surrounding vampires on Massive than, say, you do.
Eyebrows-- Server lore exists for the exact reason of keeping things orderly on the subject of server based roleplay. It is REQUIRED because if not we get tons of people who disagree on how things should go for vampires because one person says they are a vampire, the other says they are a goody two shoes fanged hero. While Roleplay is a rather free subject, rules and regulations exists to keep things fair, understandable, and sensible. You cant just ignore it because it makes your Mary Sue an impossibility!
You are saying that someone can't revolt against their leader! People don't like Wolffram because he's a hypocrite. There may be a revolt. Vampires don't like Mrs. Baver, there will be a revolt. Blocking revolts is completely against realistic medieval ages.
But revolts of a MIND CONTROLLING almighty vampiric queen from her vampiric followers? The influx of good vampires should cure themselves NOW. Then they can revolt against her, and not look like bloody RP killing jackasses. Otherwise, the small portion of good vampires that should exist might be able to resist her mind control and revolt against her for a little while.. Though, I imagine that the closer to Baver you are, the worse the mind control affects are, and the less likely one "Good" vampire would be to be able to resist Baver. Also, revolting against Baver without the sword of light is useless, and fighting darkness with darkness does not bring light, only more darkness.
You do know that most revolts during those times failed before they started right? That as soon as word of revolts was hear that people started to be exicuted
And Golivan wasn't executed being a known vampire in the middle of Regalia, forming revolts against both Wolffram and Mrs. Baver?[DOUBLEPOST=1362243037][/DOUBLEPOST]In front of both.
Nobody was paying attention to you, eyebrows, as most people try to do.. because you dont do things logically, especially in terms of lore.
It is very realistic, and most of the whole "revolt" against Wolffram is by Vampires themselves :^)
My character.The Rules! said:
Very nice RP. Lets continue!
