Conflee
Me an the bois at 3 am lookin for BEANS!
- Joined
- May 17, 2016
- Messages
- 1,513
- Reaction score
- 3,018
- Points
- 403
- Age
- 26
- Location
- Regalia.
- Website
- conflee.tumblr.com
Yea, the legs put me off. Maybe some simple color variation could be used down there? I dunno XDI still say the legs look too bare. I like the top half, but the legs just feel... naked... Its bizarre (Ill probably get used to it if thats the final design lol but for now its weirding me out)
The main reason they were able to defeat the dwarves in combat was due to their well armored legs... those don't look very armored...Yea, the legs put me off. Maybe some simple color variation could be used down there? I dunno XD
I'm assuming that the skin itself retains its leathery quality. So I don't really have that much of a problem with that.The main reason they were able to defeat the dwarves in combat was due to their well armored legs... those don't look very armored...
Dakkar were always brutes. They are naturally armored lizard-men with physical capabilities greater then that of any (normal) ailor, and with the mentality of a religious extremist.meh I give up... I saw a different view on the race but now they are just mindless brutes
the dakkar NEEEEEEEEEEEEEDDDDDDDDDD TAILS THO
Dakkar were always brutes. They are naturally armored lizard-men with physical capabilities greater then that of any (normal) ailor, and with the mentality of a religious extremist.
If this makes them dumber, then it won't really effect many people's RP, as very few people portrayed them as smart in the first place. (and if someone wanted to, then tbh, who's stopping them?)
But I agree with your last statement, DAKKAR NEED TAILS!
The original Dakkar implementation is bad. The vast majority of Dakkar role-players misinterpret or misuse the lore to power-game their way into corrupting the original concept in ways that it was never meant to be used. This is partly to blame on my own inadequate writing skills when the first iteration of Dakkar lore came out.
The new lore is more in depth and specializes the Dakkar into a specific mold or niche of gameplay that currently does not exist in our lore, that of the true "Tank" (you could argue that Orcs are tanks, but they are more offensive tanks where we lack a purely defensive race at this point). As with any rewrite, rewrites are done to target the 90% that misuse, with the collateral damage of hurting the 10% that do not. It sounds like a sucky business model, but I find this collateral damage "acceptable" when it comes to the benefits of fixing up messy messy writing.
I'm sorry your character has to change in ways you do not like, but I will not change the plans for personal dislikes/distastes of individual players when the "common good" is what is necessary. The new Dakkar race is fairer in every day roleplay, less liable to have it's entire core concept twisted to suit a player only interested in win-rp and much more in depth with more content and stuff to work on.
Dakkar weren't ever supposed to be agile. They're big rock warrior men, y'know. All strength. Raaah.meh I still can't get the idea of a brute into my head after seeing the slim old dakkar that were pretty agile but I give up do what ever you want... I have been working on an Otherly rp project
Agree'd, people still need to make skins for the Dakkar, and more experienced skinners do appreciate a little bit of variation.(Really, in roleplay, this shouldn't matter much, but the designs would be stronger with something around the legs.)
Maybe the older dakkar would be more agile, at the loss of their physical power (seeing as they get weaker as they age), but tbh, if you want a strong and fast character, I'd suggest a Wulong.meh I still can't get the idea of a brute into my head after seeing the slim old dakkar that were pretty agile
I still have this, and so, I return it back onto you, the peps of Massive RP.
@MonMarty @Kidspair @Cuzi @TutiDias @KirbyTheVampire @Everyoneelsewhocares
Oh btw this was drawn by Marty about 2 years ago.
Not to knock you off your high horse, but you literally necroed this thread that was last posted on over a month before your post to link an image that Marty had previously linked in this thread.I don't know why everyone is so worked up over tail. The wiki page never specified how short or invisible it actually is. Because it is.
Link to the only image that actually exists of Dakkar physiology