• Inventory Split Incoming

    MassiveCraft will be implementing an inventory split across game modes to improve fairness, balance, and player experience. Each game mode (Roleplay and Survival) will have its own dedicated inventory going forward. To help players prepare, we’ve opened a special storage system to safeguard important items during the transition. For full details, read the announcement here: Game Mode Inventory Split blog post.

    Your current inventories, backpacks, and ender chest are in the shared Medieval inventory. When the new Roleplay inventory is created and assigned to the roleplay world(s) you will lose access to your currently stored items.

    Important Dates

    • April 1: Trunk storage opens.
    • May 25: Final day to submit items for storage.
    • June 1: Inventories are officially split.

    Please make sure to submit any items you wish to preserve in the trunk storage or one of the roleplay worlds before the deadline. After the split, inventories will no longer carry over between game modes.

Apparent Discrepancies In The Treatment Of Some Factions Compared To Others

Status
Not open for further replies.
Joined
Apr 8, 2013
Messages
150
Reaction score
777
Points
0
Throughout my time on Massivecraft I have (I'd like to think) been part of the pvp community. In many factions and with lots of different people. For the entire time people have been punished for varying things, including myself. Flaming, hacking, glitching etc are the standard reasons for punishment. Until a few months ago I had no issues with the system despite close friends of mine being banned.

A quick story now for those who may not know. In massivecraft pvp there are two very clear sides. Magnanimus and their allies versus a smaller group consisting largely of Raptum, LakewoodMercs and Chronikatr. This is essentially a conflict that has been going on for far longer with some changes in faction names and a few side changes. However things changed recently, a large number of staff became more directly involved with one side, Magnanimus. This is not a problem as staff are obviously players in their own right and this is fine. The vast majority of the time I agree with decisions made.

However human nature I believe inevitably plays a part, despite best intentions. Personally it seems to me this has slowly come through in decisions made. The punishments given out seen to vary in severity at least in some part depending on which side someone is on. I understand past offences etc also take a part but nonetheless it still seems this way. If we look at people banned for hacking over the last few months due to pvp I think most have been fighting against Magnanimus. Has anyone in Magnanimus been banned for hacking? No. Perhaps this is correct and everyone who hacks is on one side but this does not seem right to me. I'll be clear, I'm not saying these people were not hacking just that it's strange they're all against Magnanimus. They also tend to be those who're the most effective in fighting Magnanimus.

This can also be seen in more minor punishments I believe. I know for a fact that someone against Magnanimus said "Magnanimus" in general and was muted. Fair enough if of course this was applied consistently, however it does not seem to be. Things such as "Raptum come to Mag for erp", "Pizza delivery for Raptum", "Feel free to leave your trash here, we'll take your members" nothing seems to happen past a warning.

There has also been a case of a certain player's ban appeal seemingly being ignored for some time. They made their appeal and it took over a month to be answered. A backlog of appeals perhaps? But others who made their appeals later were answered and unbanned. Again this person was someone who fought Magnanimus and their appeal was looked at by someone who is now in Magnanimus. I understand staff are expected to be unbiased and largely they are but this does not seem right. That staff involved in a war as players are then able to make staff decisions that could well affect they outcome of said war.

The problem then of course being that most the staff are on one side, this has led to almost everyone against Magnanimus feeling under pressure. There is a sense that if you do not record every fight you could get banned. On both sides people are sometimes accused of hacks. However when a majority of staff are fighting actively against you it feels like you're at greater risk. I certainly feel that way and so do others. Is this fun? No. Not everyone has a computer that can handle pvp and recording at the same time. So you say if you don't hack you have nothing to worry about. Perhaps, but people have been wrongly accused and banned before. Massivecraft may be advertised as "lag free" but most pvpers will say otherwise. This can easily make it appear so that someone is hacking from another's view.

I am aware that pvp in general still has a pretty bad reputation so many people may not care about this. Particularly as this is coming from Raptum and myself who I know have a pretty poor reputation for several reasons. I understand that, but consider if this was you and your friends on the server in this position. You are unwilling to do what you want to do due to the fact that friends are being banned around you. A large number of staff are opposed to you and still are able to make staff decisions towards you. How would you feel?

This is not directed at any one person in particular. It is a general feeling by a good amount of relatively long time players that things have reached a tipping point. I simply put myself forward to make this thread and the others agreed.

Evidence will be posted below of some of these things mentioned.

Please refrain from flaming as I understand the huge potential for flame on this thread. I have tried to get people I know to not flame on here and hopefully they will not. It would be appreciated if this was reciprocated. I also ask this is not instantly locked due to possible flame because it contains important issues for many people. Opinions are welcome so long as they're valid and are not purely flame or based on the fact this is coming from Raptum and co/myself.

image.jpg

image.jpg
 
Just to clarify, as I don't think it is said in the main post. "Massivelag" is Gridiron, while Sankeeer is, well, Lewistard.
 
Last edited:
Just to clarify, as I don't think it is said in the main post. "Massivelag" is Gridiron, while Snakeeer is, well, Snakeeer.
It's in fact lewistard that is Sankeeeer. Although I do wish to clarify something, no punishment was given out for the two pieces of evidence posted. Despite a ticket being created for the comments made in general.
 
Has anyone in Magnanimus been banned for hacking?
First off, let me state that I'm not done reading the post, and have yet to look at anyone's comments.

/seen northmc
Granted thor was in his single-person faction at the time, he was also banned.
 
First off, let me state that I'm not done reading the post, and have yet to look at anyone's comments.

/seen northmc
Granted thor was in his single-person faction at the time, he was also banned.
To be clear I did not question whether anyone in Mag was banned, but whether they had been banned for hacking.
 
"Raptum come to Mag for erp"
punishment was given for this instance.
Other instances i have not personally seen. Have you ever thought that maybe it is because there are reports that are filed and handled accordingly. If you feel someone in Magnanimus is hacking or breaking the rules then i encourage you to report them for their behaviour so the staff are aware of it. I dont think anyone of the staff that are in mag have actually handed out a ban against anyone that is fighting mag at this time. They submit reports as players if they feel something is wrong. Even then i have personally rejected tons of reports from them as i do from others with inconclusive evidence.

As for ban appeals there is a comitee that votes and yes someone in mag may have been the one to deliver the news but that does not mean that this person made the decision. We make it pretty known to staff not to handle their own issues and report it if they are in wars like normal players would. I have delivered many news where i have had no say in the ban appeal itself.

We did unfortunately have a huge backlog of ban appeals until we fixed up the system and the way they are handled now should be a lot quicker process. We apologise for the time it has taken to get answers if you have had to wait a long time it should be working better now.

If there are reports against anyone on staff or anyone in mag rest assured that it will be handled by staffmembers not involved in the wars mag have.

I hope this explains some of the prosesses going on atleast
 
I understand that, but consider if this was you and your friends on the server in this position. You are unwilling to do what you want to do due to the fact that friends are being banned around you. A large number of staff are opposed to you and still are able to make staff decisions towards you. How would you feel?
I feel I have been in such a situation before. You are correct, it is not a good feeling, it made me paranoid, and drastically increased the number of screenshots I took on a daily basis incase I happened to get banned, since this laptop would catch fire again if I tried to record.
 
punishment was given for this instance.
Other instances i have not personally seen. Have you ever thought that maybe it is because there are reports that are filed and handled accordingly. If you feel someone in Magnanimus is hacking or breaking the rules then i encourage you to report them for their behaviour so the staff are aware of it. I dont think anyone of the staff that are in mag have actually handed out a ban against anyone that is fighting mag at this time. They submit reports as players if they feel something is wrong. Even then i have personally rejected tons of reports from them as i do from others with inconclusive evidence.

As for ban appeals there is a comitee that votes and yes someone in mag may have been the one to deliver the news but that does not mean that this person made the decision. We make it pretty known to staff not to handle their own issues and report it if they are in wars like normal players would. I have delivered many news where i have had no say in the ban appeal itself.

We did unfortunately have a huge backlog of ban appeals until we fixed up the system and the way they are handled now should be a lot quicker process. We apologise for the time it has taken to get answers if you have had to wait a long time it should be working better now.

If there are reports against anyone on staff or anyone in mag rest assured that it will be handled by staffmembers not involved in the wars mag have.

I hope this explains some of the prosesses going on atleast
Thank you for the swift response and yes it does answer several things. The advice is also noted.
 
To be clear I did not question whether anyone in Mag was banned, but whether they had been banned for hacking.
Then let me ask you how many of the people in mag that has been reported for hacking?

If you feel something is wrong you cant expect us to smell it you have to report it so we can investigate even if you dont feel comfortable with reporting them then let a staffmember you trust know so they can keep an eye out.
 
Also, just something i personaly wish to see is if people disagree with the first post please say why rather than just leaving it as a disagree.

@qgmk
 
Thank you for the swift response and yes it does answer several things. The advice is also noted.
We take certain precautions at magnanimus to ensure none of our members are hacking. If we are in the arena with them or see them pvping where it looks like they may be hacking we immediately ask them to screen share their mc account without logging off. In doing this we have found one member to have a none loaded nodus when we screen shared, later he did get banned for hacking.
 
Then let me ask you how many of the people in mag that has been reported for hacking?

If you feel something is wrong you cant expect us to smell it you have to report it so we can investigate even if you dont feel comfortable with reporting them then let a staffmember you trust know so they can keep an eye out.
I'd imagine very few too none for a couple of reasons. Firstly as mentioned lots of us do not record/cannot record so even though we may believe someone is hacking we think nothing will happen because we cannot get proof. Second off because of the main issue we think there is which is that to us it seems we do not have the same voice. How many staff are in Magnanimus? Four I believe and yes we know they cannot be biased or have a major say in matters in which they're considered players. However the simple fact that they're there makes it very much seem like we will be shut down straight away even if this is not true. Particularly as even if staff may not be in mag they will certainly be friends with at least one of the staff members within Magnanimus.
 
We take certain precautions at magnanimus to ensure none of our members are hacking. If we are in the arena with them or see them pvping where it looks like they may be hacking we immediately ask them to screen share their mc account without logging off. In doing this we have found one member to have a none loaded nodus when we screen shared, later he did get banned for hacking.
Who? just out of curiosity.
 
We take certain precautions at magnanimus to ensure none of our members are hacking. If we are in the arena with them or see them pvping where it looks like they may be hacking we immediately ask them to screen share their mc account without logging off. In doing this we have found one member to have a none loaded nodus when we screen shared, later he did get banned for hacking.
Fair enough but I do not believe that you can be certain they're not doing anything at all times but perhaps I'm wrong.
 
I'd imagine very few too none for a couple of reasons. Firstly as mentioned lots of us do not record/cannot record so even though we may believe someone is hacking we think nothing will happen because we cannot get proof.
You can create a ticket at the start of the fight if you believe someone you will be fighting/have been fighting is hacking.
 
If we look at people banned for hacking over the last few months due to pvp I think most have been fighting against Magnanimus. Has anyone in Magnanimus been banned for hacking? No. Perhaps this is correct and everyone who hacks is on one side but this does not seem right to me. I'll be clear, I'm not saying these people were not hacking just that it's strange they're all against Magnanimus. They also tend to be those who're the most effective in fighting Magnanimus.

I brought this very issue up with spectec yesterday in a staff channel. There was some disgruntled response from some players due to the fact that we were unwilling to fulfill a report some people had posted against a supposed hacker. This case carried on for a full week, simply because the report didn't have enough evidence, and we went off the very assumption that it wouldn't make sense for Mag's enemies to hack.

Unfortunately today, it was proven that the report was correct because of a secondary investigation that happened locally. It seems highly unlikely that Mag's enemies are more likely to hack, but I feel there are more factors that matter here than meets the eye. Unlikely, but apparently a really striking coincidence.

This can also be seen in more minor punishments I believe. I know for a fact that someone against Magnanimus said "Magnanimus" in general and was muted. Fair enough if of course this was applied consistently, however it does not seem to be. Things such as "Raptum come to Mag for erp", "Pizza delivery for Raptum", "Feel free to leave your trash here, we'll take your members" nothing seems to happen past a warning.

The message "Raptum come to Mag for ERP" was responded to with an 8 day ban which I commanded, and Thortuna executed. The other comments I have not heard about, so I can only assume they weren't reported or seen. I get muted by lower ranks members for saying "shit" in general, and Danywood was banned a month or so ago for griefing in Ithania. Staff or their "friends" are really not treated any differently, I assure you.

There has also been a case of a certain player's ban appeal seemingly being ignored for some time. They made their appeal and it took over a month to be answered. A backlog of appeals perhaps? But others who made their appeals later were answered and unbanned. Again this person was someone who fought Magnanimus and their appeal was looked at by someone who is now in Magnanimus. I understand staff are expected to be unbiased and largely they are but this does not seem right. That staff involved in a war as players are then able to make staff decisions that could well affect they outcome of said war.

This kindof hooks into the message at the top of this post, and I really get where you're coming from. From a PR perspective I find this a very alarming thing. I warned spectec yesterday as well that this is potentially damaging to our reputation as staff, but it was unrealistic what I was asking of him. I was essentially ask him to not report players he was at war with anymore, or to give up functioning in his faction. If you really look at it, it basically came down to me asking him to stop reporting people he was convinced were hacking, simply so we could preserve our reputation. This came in response to a report which I rejected with a couple of other staff for lack of evidence, and we were all proven wrong as /vanish investigation at a later battle proved them to be hacking clear as day. To me, this is now reduced to intentionally asking staff members to avoid reporting people who they believe to be breaking the rules, to maintain our reputation, effectively letting cheaters go free to preserve our reputation. Do you understand the dilemma?

Also, could you name who were not responded to quickly? Then I can look into the reason why, because I believe I might know, but I don't know who you are specifically referring to.

The problem then of course being that most the staff are on one side, this has led to almost everyone against Magnanimus feeling under pressure. There is a sense that if you do not record every fight you could get banned. On both sides people are sometimes accused of hacks. However when a majority of staff are fighting actively against you it feels like you're at greater risk. I certainly feel that way and so do others. Is this fun? No. Not everyone has a computer that can handle pvp and recording at the same time. So you say if you don't hack you have nothing to worry about. Perhaps, but people have been wrongly accused and banned before. Massivecraft may be advertised as "lag free" but most pvpers will say otherwise. This can easily make it appear so that someone is hacking from another's view.
A large number of staff are opposed to you and still are able to make staff decisions towards you. How would you feel?

I feel like this is slightly warped out of proportion. Are you making the proper distinction between staff and playing? Your enemies are obvious in mag and their alles, but how many of the 45 staff members do you identify as opposed to you? How many of the 7 staff members in the faction Sylvan for example have identified themselves as anti you or your faction? I even made a testimonial in support of Raptum a while back.
 
Last edited:
Well at any time if you believe any of my members are hacking in a fight, please inform me and I will ask to screen share with them, or if you even believe I am using hacks, I will screen share with you while I fight.
@jquaile
 
I just tend to stay out of stuff like this, I wish to have no conflict with each side as they could easily destroy me.
I really don't think that Assembly and KillingKing hacked, there are better PvPers that aren't accused of hacks.
 
The other day, we in Raptum were being raided by Linus and one of his fac members (Who later turned out to be Sirvan) and a few of us, including myself submitted tickets asking for staff to spectate. My ticket was ignored. And others were declined. I feel as if the situation would have been handled differently if Magnanimus were on the receiving end of Thelgens raid. A few players also said that Alj (A member of mag, also a moderator) had refused to spectate, but had not given any reason as to why not.
 
The message "Raptum come to Mag for ERP" was responded to with an 8 day ban which I commanded, and Thortuna executed. The other comments I have not heard about, so I can only assume they weren't reported or seen. I get muted by lower ranks members for saying "shit" in general, and Danywood was banned a month or so ago for griefing in Ithania. Staff or their "friends" are really not treated any differently, I assure you.
If said 8 day ban had been carried out, then Spectec would have only very recently been unbanned. If my memory serves me correctly the ban was removed within a few hours of it being administrated onto him, I could however be wrong although I do remember seeing him online the same day.
 
I brought this very issue up with spectec yesterday in a staff channel. There was some disgruntled response from some players due to the fact that we were unwilling to fulfill a report some people had posted against a supposed hacker. This case carried on for a full week, simply because the report didn't have enough evidence, and we went off the very assumption that it wouldn't make sense for Mag's enemies to hack.

Unfortunately today, it was proven that the report was correct because of a secondary investigation that happened locally. It seems highly unlikely that Mag's enemies are more likely to hack, but I feel there are more factors that matter here than meets the eye. Unlikely, but apparently a really striking coincidence.



The message "Raptum come to Mag for ERP" was responded to with an 8 day ban which I commanded, and Thortuna executed. The other comments I have not heard about, so I can only assume they weren't reported or seen. I get muted by lower ranks members for saying "shit" in general, and Danywood was banned a month or so ago for griefing in Ithania. Staff or their "friends" are really not treated any differently, I assure you.



This kindof hooks into the message at the top of this post, and I really get where you're coming from. From a PR perspective I find this a very alarming thing. I warned spectec yesterday as well that this is potentially damaging to our reputation as staff, but it was unrealistic what I was asking of him. I was essentially ask him to not report players he was at war with anymore, or to give up functioning in his faction. If you really look at it, it basically came down to me asking him to stop reporting people he was convinced were hacking, simply so we could preserve our reputation. This came in response to a report which I rejected with a couple of other staff for lack of evidence, and we were all proven wrong as /vanish investigation at a later battle proved them to be hacking clear as day. To me, this is now reduced to intentionally asking staff members to avoid reporting people who they believe to be breaking the rules, to maintain our reputation, effectively letting cheaters go free to preserve our reputation. Do you understand the dilemma?




I feel like this is slightly warped out of proportion. Are you making the proper distinction between staff and playing? Your enemies are obvious in mag and their alles, but how many of the 45 staff members do you identify as opposed to you? How many of the 7 staff members in the faction Sylvan for example have identified themselves as anti you or your faction? I even made a testimonial in support of Raptum a while back.
Would it be possible for us to see the proof video? And who could be carrying out those 'local' investigations, it is highly unlikely, that any of their members would do something like this, and the only mod that is truly close to them is @Sigil, because they are close allies
 
A few players also said that Alj (A member of mag, also a moderator) had refused to spectate, but had not given any reason as to why not.
I'd like to know...
  1. Who told you that I "Refused to spectate?"
  2. When was this?
I could have been afk, busy, etc. If I'm not listed as a moderator online, I don't "technically" have to take the ticket, because I could be busy with personal stuff.
 
If said 8 day ban had been carried out, then Spectec would have only very recently been unbanned. If my memory serves me correctly the ban was removed within a few hours of it being administrated onto him, I could however be wrong although I do remember seeing him online the same day.

True enough, he was unbanned fairly quickly after submitting a ban appeal, getting a personal scrutiny round from me, yendor and Thortuna, and later by Cayorion himself.

Would it be possible for us to see the proof video? And who could be carrying out those 'local' investigations, it is highly unlikely, that any of their members would do something like this, and the only mod that is truly close to them is @Sigil, because they are close allies

Unfortunately not, the video's are confidential, besides which, they don't count as valid evidence so there is no point in us showing them to you. As for local investigations, the investigations are executed by an independent Game staff member that is not personally invested. I'm not going to throw in any names, simply because that would impede on the effectiveness of the methods used, but it's a non combatant staff member who has a lengthy experience of catching hackers first hand.
 
I'd like to know...
  1. Who told you that I "Refused to spectate?"
  2. When was this?
I could have been afk, busy, etc. If I'm not listed as a moderator online, I don't "technically" have to take the ticket, because I could be busy with personal stuff.

It was I who made the ticket, twice in one fight as someone was hacking clear as day. You took it 20 minutes later, said i should record the fight and cant spectate at this time, then marked it as done. I made the second, and Omnom did the same after giving me an explanation of why she couldnt.
 
The other day, we in Raptum were being raided by Linus and one of his fac members (Who later turned out to be Sirvan) and a few of us, including myself submitted tickets asking for staff to spectate. My ticket was ignored. And others were declined. I feel as if the situation would have been handled differently if Magnanimus were on the receiving end of Thelgens raid. A few players also said that Alj (A member of mag, also a moderator) had refused to spectate, but had not given any reason as to why not.
Yeah, I recorded one fight with Pantisen, who I then reported,... he's banned now xD
 
True enough, he was unbanned fairly quickly after submitting a ban appeal, getting a personal scrutiny round from me, yendor and Thortuna, and later by Cayorion himself.

I do have to ask this then, why was his unban appeal answered so quickly while others sit around for up to a week unanswered? I am not accusing anyone of anything, and am mearly being the curious sod that i am.
 
It was I who made the ticket, twice in one fight as someone was hacking clear as day. You took it 20 minutes later, said i should record the fight and cant spectate at this time, then marked it as done. I made the second, and Omnom did the same after giving me an explanation of why she couldnt.
Alright. Sometimes tickets are taken after the matter the ticket was created passes, and in terms of hackers, the only thing I can tell you is to record your future fights and make another ticket the next time you fight. You can't ever have too much evidence.
 
The message "Raptum come to Mag for ERP" was responded to with an 8 day ban which I commanded, and Thortuna executed.

To me, this is now reduced to intentionally asking staff members to avoid reporting people who they believe to be breaking the rules, to maintain our reputation, effectively letting cheaters go free to preserve our reputation. Do you understand the dilemma?


I feel like this is slightly warped out of proportion. Are you making the proper distinction between staff and playing? Your enemies are obvious in mag and their alles, but how many of the 45 staff members do you identify as opposed to you? How many of the 7 staff members in the faction Sylvan for example have identified themselves as anti you or your faction? I even made a testimonial in support of Raptum a while back.
The first point about the 8 day ban, if it took place then very well but I did not see it at the time and it is not in the player's /seen.

The second point I can see the problem you have and do not have any suggestions. Perhaps others might.

With the third point, we're in fact enemies with Sylvan but I would not identify them as against us. I did not particularly consider any of the Lore staff as they're not involved in this kind of thing as far as I'm aware. It's the game staff that deal with it to my knowledge. I would identify staff in Mithril/associated with Mithril also broadly as being opposed to us due to prior actions. I saw the testimonial you made and of course it's welcome but again to most pvpers you're not seen as being involved much in the pvp side of the server. Again I'm not necessarily saying this is how it is just how it seems to us.
 
Alright. Sometimes tickets are taken after the matter the ticket was created passes, and in terms of hackers, the only thing I can tell you is to record your future fights and make another ticket the next time you fight. You can't ever have too much evidence.

The fight was still occurring at the time you took the ticket, as i tried to explain to you. I understand that you do have a lot to do being staff, and respected that accordingly and still do respect that. My computer cannot run recording software to the level needed for decent proof, as it makes me lag out.
 
I do have to ask this then, why was his unban appeal answered so quickly while others sit around for up to a week unanswered? I am not accusing anyone of anything, and am mearly being the curious sod that i am.

A very valid question, that actually has a really simple response. Spectec committed his offence on the 26th of May at around 23:00 GMT ish. I personally took control of the ban appeal board at around 17:00 GMT that day.

Prior to my take-over, ban appeals were managed by a "team" of undisclosed individuals who had to form a unanimous decision on whether someone was unbanned. This process can in some extreme cases, take a month, simply because it may take that long to convince someone.

I felt that process was inefficient and decided to take over the ban appeals on the 26th to understand more strongly how ban appeals come in, and develop a process theory on how to deal with them in a streamlined environment.

Long story short, Spectec was "lucky" to make his offence hours after I personally took over ban appeals. Every ban appeal since the 26th has been handled by me personally and me alone, which is why the ban appeals after the 26th process extremely rapidly.

Note, this is a temporary streamlining experiment i am performing to support the Game staff, I will be developing my executive conclusion soon and handing the process back to them, but if I am correct, ban appeals will be processed much faster than they have been in the future.
 
@MonMarty, is there any way that Assembly and KillingKing could be given a second chance, they always complained about the lag they were having, so it might have had something to do with that, they weren't bad people, Assembly was one of the nicest PvPers I knew, at least he didn't treat me like shit like all the other PvPers [except SpecTec] who insulted me because me buying Valyria. I really, really think that he should be given a second chance.
 
Well sometimes staff do not have the ability or time to go and spectate fights, you can ask of course but its not always that we get to the tickets in time or have time or brain power to go spectate a fight as you have to be pretty alert and on your game to do so.
 
A very valid question, that actually has a really simple response. Spectec committed his offence on the 26th of May at around 23:00 GMT ish. I personally took control of the ban appeal board at around 17:00 GMT that day.

Prior to my take-over, ban appeals were managed by a "team" of undisclosed individuals who had to form a unanimous decision on whether someone was unbanned. This process can in some extreme cases, take a month, simply because it may take that long to convince someone.

I felt that process was inefficient and decided to take over the ban appeals on the 26th to understand more strongly how ban appeals come in, and develop a process theory on how to deal with them in a streamlined environment.

Long story short, Spectec was "lucky" to make his offence hours after I personally took over ban appeals. Every ban appeal since the 26th has been handled by me personally and me alone, which is why the ban appeals after the 26th process extremely rapidly.

Note, this is a temporary streamlining experiment i am performing to support the Game staff, I will be developing my executive conclusion soon and handing the process back to them, but if I am correct, ban appeals will be processed much faster than they have been in the future.

Thank you for clarifying that, and i am very happy to hear that ban appeals are going to have a faster process compared to the old one, if only due to the fact i hate hearing people in TS complaining about how long it is taking their appeal to be seen to *Coughs* @Shruubsicles *Coughs*

To be honest, the way i see it is that if you have done nothing wrong, you have nothing to fear and that is what matters. Massivecraft staff as whole do a fantastic job, and keep this server running for us as smoothly as it does. This thread is not an attack on them in any capacity, as im sure @jquaile feels the same as i do based upon previous conversations with him.
 
The first point about the 8 day ban, if it took place then very well but I did not see it at the time and it is not in the player's /seen.

In my incompetence with game staff mechanics, I unbanned him without letting the record remain. Below is the log record of it. I changed the reason on the right because I don't feel the need to broadcast the exact reason on the forum.

6289851872014-05-26 12:38:38ThortunaCommandfendarfell-4370.2,19.8,-1641.8/tempban spectec Appeal on the forum


The second point I can see the problem you have and do not have any suggestions. Perhaps others might.

The way I saw it, I sacrificed our reputation and the fact that this thread was most likely formed by my decision. I am at peace with that decision, I've decided I find cheaters to be a bigger problem than our reputation. I hope most players understand that.

With the third point, we're in fact enemies with Sylvan but I would not identify them as against us. I did not particularly consider any of the Lore staff as they're not involved in this kind of thing as far as I'm aware. It's the game staff that deal with it to my knowledge. I would identify staff in Mithril/associated with Mithril also broadly as being opposed to us due to prior actions. I saw the testimonial you made and of course it's welcome but again to most pvpers you're not seen as being involved much in the pvp side of the server. Again I'm not necessarily saying this is how it is just how it seems to us.
[/quote]

You're stating "majority of the staff" and such. The Game staff is not the largest department, the Lore staff is, and the game staff doesn't even cover 1/4 of the server staff last I checked. It's a consideration worth taking, in the same light that players don't like being generalized, staff don't either. We are all varying loyal to different factions, and not all of us are friends, what to expect of 45 people.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.