Genecide65 Needs Dethroned

So to sum this up: recruits stealing from your faction with the result of existential troubles is not allowed, but officers can wreck the whole thing if you set the permissions wrong. I don't get the difference, as in both situations you could set the permissions in a way that both szenarios are not possible, yet the first one seems to be punishable whereas the second one seems to be rather a social faux-pas.
I just go with the idea that Gene or the officer in question or both have been dealt with by staff and as usual the other players (us) won't know how this was handled, as this is something personal between Gene/the officer and staff.
 
Sephite said:
So to sum this up: recruits stealing from your faction with the result of existential troubles is not allowed, but officers can reck the whole thing if you set the permissions wrong. I don't get the difference, as in both situations you could set the permissions in a way that both szenarios are not possible, yet the first one seems to be punishable whereas the second one seems to be rather a social faux-pas.
I just go with the idea that Gene or the officer in question or both have been dealt with by staff and as usual the other players (us) won't know how this was handled, as this is something personal between Gene/the officer and staff.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
And I believe it should remain that way.
 
Nightbye1 said:
you say sorry but last time i checked vanos came to loot it the second they herd...

not really trying to offend but i sometimes doubt your sympathy...
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Yeah, we came to check it out. But "looting" and "looking" are different. Plus Raptum showed up and fighting them was fun.
 
Nightbye1 said:
No you did not look i can litterally he tool part of my gate that corrupt cut into dont even try saying you were "looking"
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
You mean he broke through your gate? If it was a 1x2 hole that's completely fine, it's hardly any damage, two iron bar blocks of expense at the most, and could easily be fixed. That's not looting, it's breaking in, yes, but he could still break in and be looking, he just didn't want to use a pearl.
 
Nightbye1 said:
ok -,- you should know that we have officer claim perms because we have 3 leaders plus officers run their own citys in our faction if we could set it so you can claim but not unclaim we would do it but that is not a option. we need claim for officers to function as im a officer and do most the building and expanding
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

Just modify your permissions to let everyone do more, basically letting the leaders of irongale be officer with more perms like claiming etc, let the members be owners of towns / cities who cant claim and recruits your normal rabble who dont own cities / towns? idfk I don't own a faction yet, I could go more in detail of what I was saying but im lazy and would rather discuss things like this in game.
 
Legoclub22 said:
You mean he broke through your gate? If it was a 1x2 hole that's completely fine, it's hardly any damage, two iron bar blocks of expense at the most, and could easily be fixed. That's not looting, it's breaking in, yes, but he could still break in and be looking, he just didn't want to use a pearl.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
thats not what i ment i mean he was litterally looting i can he tool chests around my base to he was trying to steal i was using the gate as a example
 
Nightbye1 said:
thats not what i ment i mean he was litterally looting i can he tool chests around my base to he was trying to steal i was using the gate as a example
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

I dont know what "tool chests" means. But I didnt take anything from any chests. And if you find that I did, it was an accident and I'd gladly give double back whatever I took.
 
Gobian said:
I dont know what "tool chests" means. But I didnt take anything from any chests. And if you find that I did, it was an accident and I'd gladly give double back whatever I took.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

She means she can use /he tool on the chests. If you've tried to open a chest you will be listed even if it's locked and you couldn't open it.
 
Gobian said:
I dont know what "tool chests" means. But I didnt take anything from any chests. And if you find that I did, it was an accident and I'd gladly give double back whatever I took.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...

"he tool" not "tool chests". Hawkeye tool. As in, a tool that allows players to see the block edit/use log to find out who did what. Very useful for when someone griefs or steals and you need to know what was destroyed and who did it.
 
MyCatBubbles said:
Just modify your permissions to let everyone do more, basically letting the leaders of irongale be officer with more perms like claiming etc, let the members be owners of towns / cities who cant claim and recruits your normal rabble who dont own cities / towns? idfk I don't own a faction yet, I could go more in detail of what I was saying but im lazy and would rather discuss things like this in game.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
I don't get this post. If you let everyone do more/grant every member even more permissions, how would that prevent the misuse of said permissions?
 
Sephite said:
I don't get this post. If you let everyone do more, how would that prevent the misuse of permissions?
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Basically what is being said is altering the standards for each rank.

Officers would just be the top ranking organizers for the faction and you would give the heads of all the other cities Member instead of Officer but make the permissions similar to what an Officer would be under normal circumstances and you would give Recruits the perms you normally would give to Members.

It would mean you couldn't have a lower rank then Member aka Recruit in this instance but it would allow more flexibility when divvying out permissions. Personally I don't even use the Recruit rank for anything but inactive members so it's not an overly necessary rank and could be easily used for this scenario.
 
Jackmo_Jones said:
Basically what is being said is altering the standards for each rank.

Officers would just be the top ranking organizers for the faction and you would give the heads of all the other cities Member instead of Officer but make the permissions similar to what an Officer would be under normal circumstances and you would give Recruits the perms you normally would give to Members.

It would mean you couldn't have a lower rank then Member aka Recruit in this instance but it would allow more flexibility when divvying out permissions. Personally I don't even use the Recruit rank for anything but inactive members so it's not an overly necessary rank and could be easily used for this scenario.
Click to expand...
Click to shrink...
Thanks for the explanation :) (I should have my coffee before I post xD)
 
I use Bub's (yes im going to call him that) idea XD im hoping it works we demoted all our members to recruits and left some officers that we know enough to trust elytra i obviously over thought my trust in her and she took advantage of it. this does not mean im done with the war... gene still has to pay
 

Similar threads

Rilisk
Played Character Genwy Twotoes
Replies
0
Views
224
Character Sheets
Rilisk
Rilisk
Apictos
Played Character Leandre Delmotte
Replies
0
Views
323
Character Sheets
Apictos
Apictos
Hemingway7
Played Character Salvatore Duad’Rakkatuur
Replies
0
Views
158
Character Sheets
Hemingway7
Hemingway7
Conflee
General Yearly Event Discussion And Ideas
Replies
0
Views
868
Roleplay Discussion
Conflee
Conflee
Liam Richard
Played Character Morticai Tomaise-Solarent Fleur Coeur Lièvre de Avinicci (Morty/Mort)
Replies
2
Views
212
Character Sheets
Liam Richard
Liam Richard
Top Bottom