White Knights, And What To Do With Conf Ladveer

Conflee

Me an the bois at 3 am lookin for BEANS!
Joined
May 17, 2016
Messages
1,513
Reaction score
3,018
Points
403
Age
26
Location
Regalia.
Website
conflee.tumblr.com
Hello! So I will get into the chase. I have come to the conclusion that, to me at least, White Knight seems to mean something different than what others call it. As sparked by brief chat with Marty on my profile page.

Essentially, After pondering it for 5 hours while working, I want to make this thread, to ask a few simply questions ,and try to determine when RPing as a character with strong morals stops being that, and becomes white knighting. Or what other instances can be perceived as white knighting. The hopes being, I can maybe use the information to make my own character better, because I feel he falls in the gray area a lot, or sometimes goes full White Knight when im being dumb IRL.

So firstly: What is a white knight? Most people define it as a character who gets involved in situations to defend another, because of ideals usually, for no real personal gain.


A point I want to make before the beef of this posts comes in: As I see it, White Knighting can be subjective. I might think my character has a good reason, others may not. For example, say, Player A jumps into a fight because Vampire A is attacking Vampire B. Player A knows Vampire B, and wants to help their friend, but Vampire A doesn't know that, so to them, it looks like White Knighting.



To me, I still don't see my character as a White Knight. I will be forthcoming, since this is all OOC and using it is Meta ;3 , Conf is Jacobin. Heavily. He was raised in an environment where he dealt with tons of people of various races, and cultures, and religions. As a pirate. He knew some hard working Cielothar, some lazy gluttonous Ailor, some mad Drowdar, some peaceable Shendar. All the normal lines get blurred in an environment like that. My character has strong morals as well. Which might be considered snowflakey in a world like Aloria, but he sticks by them.

I have always seen Conf as smarter though. When he was young, yea, he was a moron. Everyone was. He spoke out more, did dumber stuff, etc. But now, he tries to keep it under wraps... Barring my dumb moments IRL where I have him act like IIIIII would act. Yelling, and jumping to defend without a thought. Which isn't how I think he would act. I think he would be more subtle about it. Any comments that have Jacobin sentiments have always been masked with a veil of false devotion to Unionism. "You shouldn't hold the Varran down, it can do good work to redeem itself in the Great Way if you would allow it, and by preventing this you do harm to the True Path" etc etc. My hands move faster than my brain most times though, which I have slowly been trying to fix. My last big screw up was during the riot in front of the Bastion, 1-2 months ago now?

In my eyes, Conf jumping into situations has always been justified by his morals, even when my stupidity makes him go about it in the wrong way, either way he WOULD have gotten involved. I just did it wrong OOCly. And often times, he has found this pays off. My character has been saved, literally, saved, as in I was going to/had already give(n) Kill Perms if asked that's how badly a fight went against him, but before he can be downed suddenly friends are there. Not in a Meta way, but as in, he has casually helped so many people that I forget about almost instantly that I will have one of them be walking by and suddenly the yare like "Oh, its him!" and they stab the people in the back whom are stabbing him. To him, the method of save everyone, have many friends, and you live, has always worked.



So, the conclusion to all this, for anyone who gave a crap. I want to know what to do with Conf. My character. My first. He has been around so long, and I have so much I want to do with him, but I feel like my own blunderings, over the last 2 years, have crippled his ability to achieve his goals in many ways. Hes slowly working his way up, but slowly is the key word.

I want to keep improving my take on him. Personally I see him as a devious, clever, forward thinking tactician, with a strong moral code. But if he comes off as a Jacobin moron white knight, what I intend means nothing. How do people think I should go about things? Asking to retcon some of his past actions maybe? Or just moving on, trying to improve my future RP and hoping the past doesnt bite me in the butt.

I never cared about how Conf was seen before but I suddenly find it means a lot. So. Idk.



And to tag people I know know Conf. @Puagrace @Suicidium @Fenlee @Koajack @Jack_Castle @flareskies @KiddingAround @Choco_rox22 @avemechanicus @LlamaDelBae @ (more people i suck at names sorry if i forgot you ;o; ) and lastly, since he sparked the conversation, @MonMarty
 
maybe you oughta detach yourself from your character a little more? Instead of thinking "hmm.. what do i even do in this situation?" you should be asking "what would my character do?". If your character isn't suited for a certain type of roleplay, you don't have to join in, but idk, maybe you've tried that and it just doesn't work out.
 
I'm going to say stick to whatever happened in RP already. Retconning RP interactions, good or bad, it's a good way to fix things.

Example: I've made some stupid decisions as Dietrich. Some of them very stupid. I'd like to retcon them, but RP was had with all of them and they each contribute to a bit of character development. It's more enjoyable to see how those mistakes affect him down the line than pretending he's all perfect and flawless, which he never was to begin with.

Keep with any act actions regardless of the negative effects. It's not about whether something goes as planned, but learning from all the mistakes.
 
maybe you oughta detach yourself from your character a little more? Instead of thinking "hmm.. what do i even do in this situation?" you should be asking "what would my character do?". If your character isn't suited for a certain type of roleplay, you don't have to join in, but idk, maybe you've tried that and it just doesn't work out.
I find it hard to detach myself a lot of times. I get very into the situation, because that is how I always roleplay. For years, even before Massive.

My other just weird thing is, I would have said Amar was more White Knight than Conf is to be honest. Amar did what he did purely for his own morals, protected everyone, etc, but people found him more enjoyable- must have been the sexy muttonchops.
 
I find it hard to detach myself a lot of times. I get very into the situation, because that is how I always roleplay. For years, even before Massive.

My other just weird thing is, I would have said Amar was more White Knight than Conf is to be honest. Amar did what he did purely for his own morals, protected everyone, etc, but people found him more enjoyable- must have been the sexy muttonchops.
the lack of detachment is what i'd say is the issue. makes your ooc morals shine through further than your character's, but maybe you'll sort it some other way <3
 
Im going to push on with with as I see him, and try to focus more on what he does, making sure I think my actions through a bit more thoroughly.

Beyond that though, I am still interested in the topic of White Knights.


As I have always seen it, White Knights participate where others stand around and simi-afk watching something. Which, should be good, right? Given everyone complains about Spectator Roleplayers who sit at tables and in corners and do nothing. Im curious as to why there is such a stigma against it with Combat then. Is it just because of how overabundant White Knights are, or what?
 
Im going to push on with with as I see him, and try to focus more on what he does, making sure I think my actions through a bit more thoroughly.

Beyond that though, I am still interested in the topic of White Knights.


As I have always seen it, White Knights participate where others stand around and simi-afk watching something. Which, should be good, right? Given everyone complains about Spectator Roleplayers who sit at tables and in corners and do nothing. Im curious as to why there is such a stigma against it with Combat then. Is it just because of how overabundant White Knights are, or what?
That is a different way to approach the white knight, the engagement into role play. However, what if the role is more grey? The interjection to defend is more seeded in the idea of I saved you now you will do something for me. An exchange of favors. Might be a direction to consider if you feel the White Knight is gaining negative views. I don't believe White Knights to be very good characters. At their core they are as one dimensional as the 'expert swordsman.' They live and breathe their ideals with minimal depth, if any. But that is my own opinion.
 
That is a different way to approach the white knight, the engagement into role play. However, what if the role is more grey? The interjection to defend is more seeded in the idea of I saved you now you will do something for me. An exchange of favors. Might be a direction to consider if you feel the White Knight is gaining negative views. I don't believe White Knights to be very good characters. At their core they are as one dimensional as the 'expert swordsman.' They live and breathe their ideals with minimal depth, if any. But that is my own opinion.
I spent a day or so thinking about this and I feel like honestly that would be a better character concept to contrast the norm. A good guy, wanting to help people, compelled to step in and defend what he thinks is right, but is just, useless. Utterly. So it always goes wrong.

Thats, kind of what I had Conf be for the most part. He isn't really that good a fighter, so my early days of roleplay, probably from month 2 to month 13 on the server, he was injured and crippled badly a lot. My idea for him and his capabilities changed a lot though, he went from being average in every way, to being smart, a tactician. I wanted to push for that. So his White Knight efforts started to turn in his favor. Because he could talk his way out of things, or when he couldn't he had build enough friendships that he got suprise assistance every damn time- which in itself could be called out as White Knights backing a White knight, though most of the people who have helped me in CRP randomly have at least interacted with Conf one or more times so its iffy.



Then, I also have seen a lot of bad White Knights. I feel like I saw a lot more good ones in the past as well, but then the stigma was built up and I saw it used an a deterrent. "Stop white knighting" "Ok fine right just void" player walks off, etc. Some people use White Knight as a term to call out people who might have a valid reason for interfering, be it just normal morals, or they know the guy. The people who listen most to the OOC stuff are people who have been here a while. If they are called White Knights over and over, its like "Ok I must be doing something wrong" where as the new, less introspective player shrugs it off and keeps going. Might be its scaring off the good White Knights leaving just the bad. Thats just my rambling though I dont know enough on the topic intimately to make a call there and I g2g work now so..... XD
 
The white knights aren't annoying because they are good, righteous or whatever. They are annoying because they want to steal the highlight and be the hero in every situation and often give no regards to the roleplay content. Most story-centered RPGs punish white knights because they tend to close episodes before they can provide development to others.