- Joined
- Sep 25, 2013
- Messages
- 429
- Reaction score
- 1,757
- Points
- 568
- Age
- 29
- Location
- Pennsylvania
- Website
- knottymagpie.wordpress.com
Just thought I'd share something I've been thinking about in regards to writing developed and three dimensional characters. Typing this on my phone so apologies for typoes and whatnot.
Anyway I recently heard someone make the case that "personality traits" were a very small part of a developed character when compared to "opinions". I began to think in terms of famous characters like superheroes, and the reason why their love interests are commonly two dimensional and relatively interchangeable.
If you think about it, many of them have very similar personality traits. They're loyal, bold, kind, and supportive. Think Agent Carter from Captain America, Pepper Potts from Iron Man, or Jane from Thor. Really the main requirement for superhero romantic interest seems to be "the first girl I met in the movie" or "the girl I happen to spend the most time with during my journey." I feel this happens when too much importance is placed on personality traits, and not enough detail is given about their personal opinions.
Also worth noting is that no personality trait can be consistent at all times. While some core aspects like temperament or patience or morality may be the basis for other feelings and personality shifts, the truth is we change personalities quite often. They depend on our mood, who we are around, how much sleep we've gotten, how we have been treated lately, and all sorts of things. Even something as simple as a stomach cramp will change our personality for a time. A character who is kind and patient with a child may be short and rude to another adult. While upset over something, a character may act entirely different from when they're peacefully content. I believe this level of bleed from one context to the next is why we as humans seem to actually have quite similar traits in most instances. Most people are more or less reasonable, emotional, understanding, narrow minded, hot headed, and patient at various times in various situations.
One thing that does not change with context is a particular opinion. Someone who does not enjoy the company of children may display this in different ways at different times, such as a biting comment when agitated or a bleary contempt at best. Someone who believes that the law is more important than morality will uphold it whether they find it fair or not, in any context.
And if you say "but Maggy. This isn't right. No one can always follow their code or their opinion at all times." Well that's what I'm getting at. The true shift of a dynamic character may not come from the change of their personality at all, rather, it may just come from the changing of their opinions. In the brief moment where a staunchly conservative old man realizes that his rebellious daughter is stronger than his old views of women allowed him to see her, he has experienced a character shift. It may not change his personality. He may continue to be brash and stoic. However, a switch within his mind has been flipped, and therefor his actions will no longer be predictable.
These are the moments that climaxes aim for. These are the moments that give you goosebumps while reading the interactions between two characters. It doesn't have to imply someone has changed the characters mind on purpose, but it does imply that they had a certain way of thinking before, and a new way of thinking now.
Even without focusing on the potential shift of opinions, I would suggest writers try to consider their characters opinions on as many things as possible. Consider why they feel the way they do. Consider their upbringing, the opinions of their parents, or a particular event which taught them to think this way. Then, no matter the situation, mood, or whatever else, we will know how a character should react, and be in properly surprised or impressed if this changes.
Some prompts:
Consider two or three core beliefs your character holds. They should be entire sentences. Then detail what exact experience(s) taught them to think this way.
Does you character hold an opinion that is contrary to their parents'?
Look up moral dilemmas online and consider how your character would respond based on their opinions, rather than their personality traits.
Take a test online that is meant to determine your political party, from the point of view of your character.
List the following words from least to most important: family, righteousness, law, duty, equality, tradition, honor, compassion, wisdom, strength, popularity.
More prompts:
Consider what opinions come into play when determining how your character responds to the following situations:
A shendar is harassing you for money. He is dressed in rags and obviously has recently been beaten and bruised. He isn't polite. He doesn't seem willing to leave you alone till you've given him money for food. If you call the guard he will likely be beaten again. If you faught him, you'd likely not be punished at all. If you gave him money, he may come back for more.
A nobleman's son asks you to give up your seat for him. He asks politely, but seems to be assuming you'll do as he's asked. There isn't another open seat and he wants to sit near his family, but you will have to stand or sit in a less desirable place, near the open door on a snowy night. He is already moving forward, assuming you will leave.
While running some final errands well into the night, you see a woman being screamed at by her husband. Eventually he slaps her, and she tries to move behind you in fear. You don't know these people, nor what they're fighting about. The woman is frightened, but is definitely the man's wife and therefor the husband has the right to correct her behavior in public. Your intervention may spare the woman now, but may cause her more trouble later. Not to mention you'll be grievously insulting the man. And yet, her feeble plea for help is sincere and pitious.
You are given the task of determining which of your children will become heir to your family's priceless heirloom sword. The oldest son was brought up to assume responsibility over your holdings. He will one day be head of the household and must be respected by the others. The second son is a soldier who would likely use the sword with the most skill, but it would see many years of hard battle and could be lost or broken in his care. It would also be an insult your oldest son if the heirloom was passed below him. The third son has lived in the shadow of his brothers, and you fear he may resent them for all they have. Giving him the sword would repair that bridge and make him happy, ensuring his loyalty to his brothers.
I hope these prompts have at least brought up some ideas for your characters. As elementary as some of you may see it, I honestly hadn't put too much thought into opinions. They came second, after personality had been established, rather like passive assumptions than well thought out core aspects of the character. I now believe that a great character may benefit from being built based on opinions, with personality coming later.
Examples of opinions:
While every situation needs to be assessed properly, the importance of the law is keeping order, and defying that order on the grounds of morality would inspire chaos in the realm. A guards duty is to preserve order, even if that means justice is sometimes overlooked.
The law exists to protect people from being wronged. If defying the law is what it takes to keep society fair and just, then it is justified for a guard to overlook some rules.
A person who is loyal to me will always have my respect, despite their previous actions and sins. I would rather have a friend who is loyal over one who is a good person.
I could never fully trust someone I disagreed with, even if they were good to me.
Women should obey their husbands. There is a bond of trust that a husband is always making decisions for the good of the wife's family. Therefor, women should trust in their every command. If he is incompetent, or untrustworthy, she should persue divorce rather than disobey him routinely.
Women have a duty just as men do, and should be respected for upholding it. This means a wife/mother deserves an equal say in matters of the home, on a personal level. Even if the law will side with the husband, a husband should side with his wife.
No amount of money is worth one's dignity.
No amount of pride is worth more than feeding my starving family.
Would love to hear your feedback!
Anyway I recently heard someone make the case that "personality traits" were a very small part of a developed character when compared to "opinions". I began to think in terms of famous characters like superheroes, and the reason why their love interests are commonly two dimensional and relatively interchangeable.
If you think about it, many of them have very similar personality traits. They're loyal, bold, kind, and supportive. Think Agent Carter from Captain America, Pepper Potts from Iron Man, or Jane from Thor. Really the main requirement for superhero romantic interest seems to be "the first girl I met in the movie" or "the girl I happen to spend the most time with during my journey." I feel this happens when too much importance is placed on personality traits, and not enough detail is given about their personal opinions.
Also worth noting is that no personality trait can be consistent at all times. While some core aspects like temperament or patience or morality may be the basis for other feelings and personality shifts, the truth is we change personalities quite often. They depend on our mood, who we are around, how much sleep we've gotten, how we have been treated lately, and all sorts of things. Even something as simple as a stomach cramp will change our personality for a time. A character who is kind and patient with a child may be short and rude to another adult. While upset over something, a character may act entirely different from when they're peacefully content. I believe this level of bleed from one context to the next is why we as humans seem to actually have quite similar traits in most instances. Most people are more or less reasonable, emotional, understanding, narrow minded, hot headed, and patient at various times in various situations.
One thing that does not change with context is a particular opinion. Someone who does not enjoy the company of children may display this in different ways at different times, such as a biting comment when agitated or a bleary contempt at best. Someone who believes that the law is more important than morality will uphold it whether they find it fair or not, in any context.
And if you say "but Maggy. This isn't right. No one can always follow their code or their opinion at all times." Well that's what I'm getting at. The true shift of a dynamic character may not come from the change of their personality at all, rather, it may just come from the changing of their opinions. In the brief moment where a staunchly conservative old man realizes that his rebellious daughter is stronger than his old views of women allowed him to see her, he has experienced a character shift. It may not change his personality. He may continue to be brash and stoic. However, a switch within his mind has been flipped, and therefor his actions will no longer be predictable.
These are the moments that climaxes aim for. These are the moments that give you goosebumps while reading the interactions between two characters. It doesn't have to imply someone has changed the characters mind on purpose, but it does imply that they had a certain way of thinking before, and a new way of thinking now.
Even without focusing on the potential shift of opinions, I would suggest writers try to consider their characters opinions on as many things as possible. Consider why they feel the way they do. Consider their upbringing, the opinions of their parents, or a particular event which taught them to think this way. Then, no matter the situation, mood, or whatever else, we will know how a character should react, and be in properly surprised or impressed if this changes.
Some prompts:
Consider two or three core beliefs your character holds. They should be entire sentences. Then detail what exact experience(s) taught them to think this way.
Does you character hold an opinion that is contrary to their parents'?
Look up moral dilemmas online and consider how your character would respond based on their opinions, rather than their personality traits.
Take a test online that is meant to determine your political party, from the point of view of your character.
List the following words from least to most important: family, righteousness, law, duty, equality, tradition, honor, compassion, wisdom, strength, popularity.
More prompts:
Consider what opinions come into play when determining how your character responds to the following situations:
A shendar is harassing you for money. He is dressed in rags and obviously has recently been beaten and bruised. He isn't polite. He doesn't seem willing to leave you alone till you've given him money for food. If you call the guard he will likely be beaten again. If you faught him, you'd likely not be punished at all. If you gave him money, he may come back for more.
A nobleman's son asks you to give up your seat for him. He asks politely, but seems to be assuming you'll do as he's asked. There isn't another open seat and he wants to sit near his family, but you will have to stand or sit in a less desirable place, near the open door on a snowy night. He is already moving forward, assuming you will leave.
While running some final errands well into the night, you see a woman being screamed at by her husband. Eventually he slaps her, and she tries to move behind you in fear. You don't know these people, nor what they're fighting about. The woman is frightened, but is definitely the man's wife and therefor the husband has the right to correct her behavior in public. Your intervention may spare the woman now, but may cause her more trouble later. Not to mention you'll be grievously insulting the man. And yet, her feeble plea for help is sincere and pitious.
You are given the task of determining which of your children will become heir to your family's priceless heirloom sword. The oldest son was brought up to assume responsibility over your holdings. He will one day be head of the household and must be respected by the others. The second son is a soldier who would likely use the sword with the most skill, but it would see many years of hard battle and could be lost or broken in his care. It would also be an insult your oldest son if the heirloom was passed below him. The third son has lived in the shadow of his brothers, and you fear he may resent them for all they have. Giving him the sword would repair that bridge and make him happy, ensuring his loyalty to his brothers.
I hope these prompts have at least brought up some ideas for your characters. As elementary as some of you may see it, I honestly hadn't put too much thought into opinions. They came second, after personality had been established, rather like passive assumptions than well thought out core aspects of the character. I now believe that a great character may benefit from being built based on opinions, with personality coming later.
Examples of opinions:
While every situation needs to be assessed properly, the importance of the law is keeping order, and defying that order on the grounds of morality would inspire chaos in the realm. A guards duty is to preserve order, even if that means justice is sometimes overlooked.
The law exists to protect people from being wronged. If defying the law is what it takes to keep society fair and just, then it is justified for a guard to overlook some rules.
A person who is loyal to me will always have my respect, despite their previous actions and sins. I would rather have a friend who is loyal over one who is a good person.
I could never fully trust someone I disagreed with, even if they were good to me.
Women should obey their husbands. There is a bond of trust that a husband is always making decisions for the good of the wife's family. Therefor, women should trust in their every command. If he is incompetent, or untrustworthy, she should persue divorce rather than disobey him routinely.
Women have a duty just as men do, and should be respected for upholding it. This means a wife/mother deserves an equal say in matters of the home, on a personal level. Even if the law will side with the husband, a husband should side with his wife.
No amount of money is worth one's dignity.
No amount of pride is worth more than feeding my starving family.
Would love to hear your feedback!
Last edited: