New posts

Regalian Roleplay Rules
1. Roleplay rules apply in this category.
2. Posts are in-character.
3. Posts are not anonymous.
4. Posts and reactions made to posts are public. What your character says or does is known by all other characters. If you would like a reaction to be private, do not post it as a public response to a thread. Roleplay it out on the server!
5. Out-of-character commentary on threads is not allowed unless it is specifically spoiled or bracketed, and/or highlights additional information for in-character responses.
6. Meme responses are not allowed. This includes reposting the same content as the poster(s) above, or repeating catch phrases on a post.

Reply to thread

Message

Lysimachus, a man claiming a spot as a philosopher, posts an addendum note as a commentary. Specifically, the note is labeled as follows with the text left below:

[SPOILER="Note"]Note

A very well composed essay, I must begin by saying. I wished only to elaborate perhaps on a way of interpreting the relationship between the three estates, specifically two of them being the nobility and the common folk. See, without the clergy, the two classes are dialectically opposed, doomed to exist in contradiction of one another. Peace between the two is largely an illusion kept by a weakly kept secular social contract. Consent is the only bond between man, with force as its agent. Society requires the presence of the Clergy, as not just a guide for the spirit of the empire, but as a mitigation of the two estates in conflict. The clergy is present to forge bonds that make the individuals in either class seem familiar, and with common purpose.

Those who would disagree with you would seek to liberate us from these bonds and progress toward ultimate secular authority, where tolerance prevails for the immoral, and the conflicts stated previous would run rampant throughout the empire. I share your fear, and as a member of the common folk, I wish to convey my deep concern and desire to support this wonderfully crafted work that you have presented.

The note is signed with the name-
Lysimachus.

[/SPOILER]

237 Words

<blockquote data-quote="Nicomachean" data-source="post: 1001611" data-attributes="member: 18733">Lysimachus, a man claiming a spot as a philosopher, posts an addendum note as a commentary. Specifically, the note is labeled as follows with the text left below:[SPOILER=&quot;Note&quot;]NoteA very well composed essay, I must begin by saying. I wished only to elaborate perhaps on a way of interpreting the relationship between the three estates, specifically two of them being the nobility and the common folk. See, without the clergy, the two classes are dialectically opposed, doomed to exist in contradiction of one another. Peace between the two is largely an illusion kept by a weakly kept secular social contract. Consent is the only bond between man, with force as its agent. Society requires the presence of the Clergy, as not just a guide for the spirit of the empire, but as a mitigation of the two estates in conflict. The clergy is present to forge bonds that make the individuals in either class seem familiar, and with common purpose. Those who would disagree with you would seek to liberate us from these bonds and progress toward ultimate secular authority, where tolerance prevails for the immoral, and the conflicts stated previous would run rampant throughout the empire. I share your fear, and as a member of the common folk, I wish to convey my deep concern and desire to support this wonderfully crafted work that you have presented.The note is signed with the name-Lysimachus. [/SPOILER]</blockquote>

[QUOTE="Nicomachean, post: 1001611, member: 18733"] [B]Lysimachus, [/B]a man claiming a spot as a philosopher, posts an addendum note as a commentary. Specifically, the note is labeled as follows with the text left below: [SPOILER="Note"]Note A very well composed essay, I must begin by saying. I wished only to elaborate perhaps on a way of interpreting the relationship between the three estates, specifically two of them being the nobility and the common folk. See, without the clergy, the two classes are dialectically opposed, doomed to exist in contradiction of one another. Peace between the two is largely an illusion kept by a weakly kept secular social contract. Consent is the only bond between man, with force as its agent. Society requires the presence of the Clergy, as not just a guide for the spirit of the empire, but as a mitigation of the two estates in conflict. The clergy is present to forge bonds that make the individuals in either class seem familiar, and with common purpose. Those who would disagree with you would seek to liberate us from these bonds and progress toward ultimate secular authority, where tolerance prevails for the immoral, and the conflicts stated previous would run rampant throughout the empire. I share your fear, and as a member of the common folk, I wish to convey my deep concern and desire to support this wonderfully crafted work that you have presented. [I]The note is signed with the name- Lysimachus. [/I] [/SPOILER] [/QUOTE]

Verification

Top Bottom