Question

twinCatalysts

Former Leader of Tyberia
Joined
Dec 3, 2015
Messages
91
Reaction score
60
Points
0
Is respect a right, is it earned, or is it somewhere in between?
What do you believe, and what does your character believe?
Are they the same?
 
Is respect a right, is it earned, or is it somewhere in between?
What do you believe, and what does your character believe?
Are they the same?

I (and my character) would say it's somewhere in between. We have the same views on this, so I'll just refer to us as "I."

I believe people deserve certain kinds of respect, while others must be earned. People have basic human rights that should be respected. Although what exactly fits into that category is sort of ambiguous, it's usually easy to tell when "basic human rights" are being infringed. I suppose Locke's "natural rights" of life, liberty and property is the best way to describe this. Respect of these rights is a given and should not have to be earned.

However, other kinds of respect do need to be earned: the types of respect that pertain to our actions and character. For someone to respect our character, we must earn their respect by being a good person. For someone to respect our writing, we must earn that respect by consistently demonstrating the ability to write well. For someone to respect us as a baseball player, we must earn that by consistently demonstrating our skill in baseball. And so on and so forth, for virtually every action and aspect of character that you can imagine.

TL;DR: Basic human rights (right to life, right to liberty, right to own property, right to pursue happiness, etc) deserve unconditional respect. Respect relating to actions and character must be earned by demonstrating excellence in that aspect of our lives.
 
Respect is tricky. To a total stranger you give the basic form of respect but as you get to know somebody Respect might mean something else. It's a give and take.
 
In my mind, respect is like a meter that rises and falls based on actions among other things.

It starts at a basic level, for all people

[IIIII------------------------] something like this. Then depending on things they say/do/reveal, the meter will rise and fall. The meter will never go negative, but once it reaches zero it becomes almost revulsion. To reach something this low you've got to do something real nasty, like screw desperate college students over with loans they know they won't be able to repay, or punching pregnant woman for twisted entertainment. That's when I've lost respect, they lose any privileges or support from me. However, I will not go against them as I am a firm believer in lead by example.

for example, let's say I walk up to someone I've never seen before. we'll refer to them as susan. Susan's bar is at that of a basic person.
[IIIII------------------------] as she approaches, I take note of things like her posture, her scent, her walking style, etc. etc. these things add up to a cumulative +I, so now she's at a whopping [IIIIII---------------------] for whatever reason, she feels the need to greet and talk to me, so she approaches, shakes my hand, gives me her name, and states some sort of intent. I giver her another +I for clearly defined purpose, as well as etiquette.

Those are shallow things, so they only give initial points. Once we get into the deep and I over-analyze everything she says and does, she'll continue scoring points based off of how I see her. After a long time of this I will of established a relationship, and her points stabilize. She'll no longer gain or lose for the small things, and even some of the bigger things, and I also compare who she is now to how she acted when we first met. I then re-analyze and re-tally points based on who she's presented herself as. At this point, the only way to increase points would be to actually go through dynamic character development, and essentially change who she is as a person.

This is at least a more technical version of how I treat respect. It's a little more pragmatic than this, but this is the gist of it.
 
TL;DR: Basic human rights (right to life, right to liberty, right to own property, right to pursue happiness, etc) deserve unconditional respect.

This is 100% correct.

I also think it's important to distinguish politeness from respect. A random stranger that you meet on the street, deserves your politeness until they give you a reason to not be polite. However respect is a much more complex thing, involving appreciation for ideas and their quality of character, which is simply not something that you should give out until somebody has earned it. It doesn't take long to earn respect, you can earn mine within a day, but you can also lose my respect within the same amount of time.
 
By the definition of respect,
"a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements."

I would say that no, people do not achieve respect by having first been met, however if they were to accomplish a great task causing people to look up to them, then yes, they will have respect; also including if they were to become a personal relationship on terms of the better.

HOWEVER, everyone, whether they have a good, or bad background on them deserve, as Barsi_ said, politeness. There is absolutely no reason to simply be rude to someone you havnt met before, it not only affects your mood, but theirs as well. It is better to be polite to everyone, unless of course, they had done something to lose it.