Within the community, i've seen so many players being banned, but for what reasons? Some say they've been banned for hacking or other misconduct, which should be fine, but should only be fine if their "claims" are backed up by evidence. Its how our justice system works in real life and should be implemented into the staff 's disciplinary agenda. Players should be able to view the evidence from an accredited staff member that led to the decision of banning [named] player. So, why am I pushing for this? It's only fair for players and most likely the best way to keep player disparity between staff and players from spreading even more. I am also pushing for this change so there isn't any mis-bans and unfairness in the Massivecraft Community. Having proof by your side when showing to a banned players not only improves trust between staff members, but also allows players to understand why they're banned and not just banned for an abnormal reason. There should always be some sort of evidence that proves that, that person should be banned for this reason and should be Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The communication between staff and players are lacked, but can be fixed if a few changes would be implemented. These changes, of course are only beneficial and nothing but beneficial and would only increase player happiness and players from leaving Massivecraft.
Have a thread that that allows players to appeal for their ban case that allows them to view evidence that was either submitted by players or evidence that was agreed upon staff. If staff members aren't willing to show evidence due to privacy issue, the privacy is between the banned player and staff members with all submission names concealed. So again not only is the name concealed so no backlash happens to players, but the banned player is also able to understand why he is banned. Im only able to understand this fustration because i've been there and have been banned for something wrong. It's a really simple solution and if staff members arn't able to show proof to someone that is banned, then that is below Reasonable Doubt. Reasonable doubt should always be above 99% certainty and evidence should be shown between the banned players so they are not feeling that they've been mistreated unfairly of some sort.
So please help push for this change if you strongly believe that this is the way to go, because change can only happen if the community pushes for it. I am only advocating for it.
Thank you.
Have a thread that that allows players to appeal for their ban case that allows them to view evidence that was either submitted by players or evidence that was agreed upon staff. If staff members aren't willing to show evidence due to privacy issue, the privacy is between the banned player and staff members with all submission names concealed. So again not only is the name concealed so no backlash happens to players, but the banned player is also able to understand why he is banned. Im only able to understand this fustration because i've been there and have been banned for something wrong. It's a really simple solution and if staff members arn't able to show proof to someone that is banned, then that is below Reasonable Doubt. Reasonable doubt should always be above 99% certainty and evidence should be shown between the banned players so they are not feeling that they've been mistreated unfairly of some sort.
So please help push for this change if you strongly believe that this is the way to go, because change can only happen if the community pushes for it. I am only advocating for it.
Thank you.
